Title Search Report · Maharashtra
The title is not what you are told.
It is what the registers say.
Cleartitle searches all four registers behind a Maharashtra property, reconstructs thirty years of ownership, and returns a plain verdict on whether to proceed — signed by an enrolled advocate.
* Most reports are delivered in under four hours. The committed service level is 8 business hours from payment, and that is the date your order confirmation carries. Where a record has to be fetched in person, the tracker says so rather than moving a bar that means nothing.
- Under 4 hours*Typical delivery, start to signature
- 30 yearsOf ownership reconstructed
- 4 registersSearched for every property
A Cleartitle report is the answer to one question: can this property be transacted, and on what conditions. We search every register that holds part of the answer, cite each entry to the document and the date it was searched, and an enrolled advocate signs the verdict that goes into your file.
Why this is hard
In India, land does not come with a guarantee.
Every year, property disputes make up a large share of what Indian civil courts spend their time on — and almost none of them begin as a dispute. They begin as an entry nobody read, in a register nobody searched, years before the transaction that surfaced it.
Presumptive
What a land record actually proves
A 7/12 extract is evidence of possession, not a guarantee of ownership. The state does not certify your title — which is why the search behind it is the only thing standing between you and someone else’s claim.
Four offices
Where the answer is kept
The Sub-Registrar holds what was registered. The revenue office holds who is recorded. City survey holds the urban parcels. The courts hold what is disputed. None of them talks to the others, and a search of one is not a search.
Decades
How long a defect stays buried
An unreleased mortgage from 2009, an heir never brought onto the record, a suit filed under a name spelled differently. None of it surfaces when you look at today’s extract. All of it surfaces when you try to sell, or when the bank tries to enforce.
The answer
Every report ends in one of three sentences.
Most title reports make you read nine pages to find out what the advocate actually thinks. Ours states it on the first page, names the conditions attached to it, and then shows the work underneath.
Proceed
The chain is complete, nothing is outstanding on the record, and the searches returned nothing against the property or the parties.
Proceed, subject to conditions
The record supports the title, and something specific has to be cleared first. The report names each condition and what would satisfy it — a release, an order, a missing entry.
Do not proceed
Something in the record defeats the transaction as it stands: a live suit over the parcel, a break in the chain, a holder who could not have transferred what was transferred.
The document
This is what arrives.
A page of the report as it is delivered — the verdict, the finding, the register it came from, the date it was searched, and the advocate’s signature. The layout is the same whether you order one search or two hundred.
What we actually check
The defects that survive an ordinary search.
A search that reads the current extract and stops will pass almost every property. These are the six places the record disagrees with itself — and each one is checked on every report, whether or not the file looks clean.
- 01
Every entry in the chain, not just the current one
The 7/12 tells you who holds the land today. The mutation register tells you how they came to, and it is where the break hides. We read every ferfar entry in the period, including the ones the extract only refers to.
- 02
Names, in every spelling they were recorded in
Kawle, Kawale, Kavle. Dnyanoba, Dnyaneshwar. One holder, three spellings across three offices — and a litigation search run against only one of them comes back clean. We search the variants, and the report lists which ones we used.
- 03
Charges matched open to close
A society loan or a bank mortgage is not discharged because someone says it was. Every charge is matched to the entry that closed it. Charges never closed are flagged — and so are charges that were closed and then reappeared on the computerised record.
- 04
Area reconciled across the record
When the deed conveys 74 ares and the revenue record shows the buyer holding 81, that difference is either explained by an entry or it is a finding. It does not get rounded away.
- 05
Deeds matched to the entry that recorded them
A sale registered in 1997 and mutated in 2014 is not a clerical curiosity; it is seventeen years in which the record said something different from the deed. We measure the gap on every link and report the ones that matter.
- 06
Court remarks checked against the court
A litigation note on a 7/12 is a clerk’s summary, and it can carry the wrong case number. We take the remark to the court record rather than reprinting it, and where the two disagree the report says so.
Section by section
Ten sections. Every one sourced.
- The verdict
- Proceed, proceed subject to conditions, or do not proceed — on page one.
- Chain of title, 30 years
- Every transfer in the last thirty years, in order, with the deed behind each one.
- Search of Index II
- The Sub-Registrar’s index of registered instruments for the property.
- 7/12 extract and mutation history
- The revenue record, and every ferfar entry that changed it.
- Property Card / CTS record
- For city survey areas, the record that replaces the 7/12.
- Encumbrance search
- Mortgages, charges and liens found on the record, matched open to close.
- Litigation search
- Court records searched against the property and every spelling of the parties.
- Development and land-use status
- Non-agricultural orders, zoning and RERA registration where applicable.
- Documents relied upon, with search dates
- A list of every document read, and the date each register was searched.
- Advocate’s scope, findings and signature
- What the advocate examined, what they found, and their signature.
From request to signature.
- 01
You give us the property
Survey or CTS number, village, district, and any documents you already hold. If we cannot identify the parcel from what you have, we tell you before you pay rather than after.
- 02
We pull every record, not the top one
Sub-registrar, revenue, city survey and court records — every mutation entry the extract refers to, and every spelling the parties were recorded under. Each search is dated and each finding keeps a reference back to the page it came from.
- 03
The findings are checked against each other
Deeds against entries, charges against their closures, areas against the record, court remarks against the court. Contradictions are surfaced as findings rather than resolved silently in favour of the tidier answer.
- 04
An advocate reviews and signs
An enrolled advocate examines the findings, decides what the record supports, states the scope, sets the verdict, and signs. The signature is the product; nothing is released without it.
Who orders one
Four buyers, one document.
Individually, or as a team with shared billing and a single view of every file in progress.
Banks and NBFCs
Lend on a searched title, not a summarised one.
The same ten sections on every file, so credit and legal reviewers read one document and know where to look. A named advocate on the certificate page when an auditor asks who certified this. Turnaround you can put in an SLA, and a verdict your checklist can be filled from.
Property agents and brokers
Answer the question that kills the deal, before it is asked.
The buyer’s bank will search this title eventually. Finding the unreleased charge yourself, two weeks earlier, is the difference between a condition you can get cleared and a sale that collapses at sanction.
Builders and developers
Aggregate land without inheriting somebody’s dispute.
Multiple survey numbers, one project file, one format across all of them. Every parcel gets the same thirty-year reconstruction, so the weak one in the assembly is visible before it is the one holding up a launch.
Advocates and law firms
The search, without the week it takes to do it.
Sourced findings, every document relied upon listed with its search date, and the register work already done. Take our findings and give the opinion yourself — the signature stays with your firm if that is how you work.
What we search, and where.
- Years of ownership reconstructed
- 30Years of ownership reconstructed
- Registers searched for every property
- 4Registers searched for every property
- Risk rules applied before an advocate sees the file
- 27Risk rules applied before an advocate sees the file
- Pune talukas live at launch
- 3Pune talukas live at launch
These are counts from our own reference data and rule set, not projections. We do not publish a delivered-report number until it is both real and material.
Pricing
₹9,999 per report.
One property, one report, one price, the advocate’s signature included. Teams and institutions are priced per contract — a different arrangement from the retail price, not a discount on it.